Church without a church

What is the Outchurch? Its a church without a church.  Its “out” because we aren’t “in” church.  Why are we outchurch? Because we aren’t inchurch.

What about the “forsake not the gathering of yourselves together” and all that stuff?  Well, there’s not much more than that is there?  We’ve built a theory of church (ecclesiology as they say) on a couple of lines of scripture.  Where can we gather with others of faith? Online? Yes.  Out in the surf? Yes.  At the coffeeshop? Yes.  Do you need to go to a church building at all? No.  You certainly don’t need to do all of that church stuff.  Think about each of the church things that we do in church? Its all the man made stuff.  Certainly, some good things happen “in church” but no more than can happen “out church.”

Posted in What is Church? | 1 Comment

Suspicion

I had a friend tell me that he’s still sticking it out at his big church.  He can’t quite seem to justify leaving.  But, he seemed discontent.  I asked more, and something interesting came out that I had not heard from other leavers.  He said that one of the things bothering him was a that he felt a sense that others were “suspicious” of him.  They were suspicious that he might not be anti-gay, anti-abortion, or not republican.  They were suspicious that he was an anti-consumption, vegetarian hippie or some other “thing” that wasn’t exactly what the church people knew what to do with.  They didn’t know how to make conversation with him.  They were guarded, as if he was an intruder.  Here’s what funny: he’s been at this church since he was a child, and now he’s 40.

Anyone else felt the sense that others are suspicious of them?  If you’ve found yourself drifting from the far right, you no longer toe the party line that Evangelicalism is selling, do you find others looking at you like an outsider?

Posted in What is Church? | 1 Comment

Religion as the Opposite of Christianity

Religion is something that man makes, packages and then puts on other people.  Religion is a burden.  Religion enslaves.  Religion empowers those who make it and package it.  But, religion also empowers those whom it enslaves by giving them a claim to right-ness.  People quickly trade freedom for comfort.  In terms of religion, people take being right, and in exchange take upon themselves the burdens of man-made religion.  Being right feels good.  It is our human tendency to want to be right.  It brings comfort.  But, it also brings a sense of pride.

Here’s the funny thing about these tendencies: they are the very opposite of what Christianity stands for.  Jesus did not bring a message of “we are right” in any way.  He brought a message of love.  Love requires that one not be prideful; but humble.  Jesus rebuked the religious leaders for their pride; or believing that they were right, and putting that on everyone else.  In this way, religion has a tendency to become the opposite of what it sets out to be.  It is a force like gravity or entropy; we import our human nature (shall I say our sin nature?) into our religion, and thereby make it, either all at once or slowly over time, into something that is and does the very opposite of what it should.

What does this mean for Christianity? One thing that evangelicals often fail to do is to consider how Jesus approached the existing institution as a way of avoiding the trap of religion.  Jesus was a revolutionary, not a reformer.  He didn’t come to displace the Pharisee sect or to setup a new doctrine with the same organizational approach.  He revolted against the institution, was critical of it. He thrashed the temple with a whip (twice?).  He criticized the arrogance of the religious leaders.  He accused the religious leadership of putting burdens on people that the leaders themselves could not bear.  He taught that they had all missed the point of the rules and doctrine.

How can we apply this to our modern practice of Christianity? It means shifting our approach from simply re-religiousizing what Jesus said, and apply what He said in the same mode as how He did it.  Churches tend to be all about what Jesus said, but in the abstract from how He said it.  We want his doctrine without His rationale; we want His words without His approach; we want the red letters and not the spirit of revolution that was motivating His sermons.

To be “Christians” means to follow Christ.  If we follow Him in what He said AND what He did, we are more likely to find a way of doing Christianity that is less religious.  In the end, maybe we have to accept the cycle of religiosity: we tend to take what is good and mix it with our negative human tendencies (pride, rightness, selfishness), and soon it becomes religion.  In response, a Christian approach to Christianity might be to recognize this tendency and to respond to it with revolution, the way Jesus responded to religion with revolution.  In revolt, Christianity breaks free of religiousness.  This brings something fresh and “new.”  Maybe that’s where real Christianity happens: on the fringes, on the crest of revolution; in reaction to religious “christianity.”

Posted in What is Church? | Leave a comment

Membership?

Yes, you can become a member of a church that’s not in church.  Outchurch has a “membership” of sorts, like any organization.

How? Sign up to the blog and voila! you become a member.  Why should it be more complicated than that?

Amaze your Christian church-going friends with your new answer to their question, “where do you go to church” with something other than a blank stare.

Get your fundamentalist parents off your back, “Yes, Mom, I’m going to church.  Oh, yes, the sermons are lovely.  Yes, they have all sorts of programs, I can even submit prayer requests online.”

Posted in Membership | 1 Comment

How you say?

Here’s a fundamental (ugh, why did I use that word?!) concept for the Outchurch to think about: using common language to approach faith.  I’d like to propose that we can have a conversation about faith, about God, about Jesus Christ, without pulling out words like eschatology, apostolic, millennial, worship, sin, praise, holy, and a hundred other words that are all loaded.  Loaded words don’t help a conversation.

This is no easy task.  How, one might ask, can we discuss Jesus without using the word “sin?”  I have a good idea of how to do this.  Let me use an example:  I’m going to “preach a sermon” and teach you how to avoid loaded words.  I’m using the word “preach a sermon” in quotes because it is another loaded term.  Instead of “sermon” why not use the word “conversation.”  First, I don’t think anyone learns from sermons, they learn from dialog.  People are smarter than we give them credit for.  Preaching sermons just doesn’t do a whole lot of good.  Jesus, who was a really amazing communicator, didn’t do much preaching.  He entered into story telling and dialog.  He asked questions.  He knew how smart people were and didn’t feel the need to cram some crap down their throats.  Socrates had a method of teaching where he presumed that all of the knowledge was already in people’s heads, and all he could do as the teacher was draw it out by asking questions.  Law schools use the “socratic method” to teach law students because it does two things: it teaches the subject and it engages the student in the process of analysis.

Why even use a word like “sermon?”  It has lost its meaning and now is loaded with religious connotation.  It does nothing to open the mind.  It does nothing to help dialog or engage in conversation.  This blog entry is a dialog.  Do you notice the questions? I’m trusting you to be a smart, thinking person.  You don’t need someone to tell you what to think or how to live.  You need someone to engage you in a dialog that lets you flesh-out your own approach(es) to live and faith.  The rest is between you and God, and between you and others around you.

Have we lost something special if we drop the word “sermon” from our vernacular? I don’t think so.  Can we drop “preach” as well? Can we drop “worship?” What about such integral words as “saved?”  Step back and think about it.  Why do we use the word “saved” anyhow? Its a word that imports a whole lot of baggage from the past century of evangelicalism.  Can we talk about Christianity and faith without this word? I think we can.

Someone once told me that if you stop using all of these words, you wouldn’t be able to recognize the believers from the unbelievers (more loaded words).  My response was “exactly!”  Was Jesus known for spouting the loaded words of the religious leaders of his day? No.  He was known for his conduct, his love, his life.  If you don’t recognize a person of faith because they don’t use the loaded words of evangelicalism, that’s a sad commentary on the state of evangelicalism.

Posted in Doctrine, What is Outchurch | 3 Comments

I’d like to introduce you to….

The Outchurch

I’d like to introduce you to the fastest growing subgroup of Christians: the outchurched.  The truth is that people are leaving church.  They start by leaving one church, and going to another.  In typical American fashion, we have so many options, like channels on a television.  Each time they leave, they feel a pang of guilt, but they are so happy to feel free of something that just wasn’t right at that last place.  The pastor was weird, or they loved the pastor but the people were weird.  Maybe the people in political power were simply not nice or someone embezzled or had an affair or elders wives were too judgmental or any number of things.  Leaving felt good, but leaving wasn’t the solution, it was finding a new church.  The guilt of leaving is quickly washed away by the excitement of a new church.  The pastor is amazing, or the children’s program is great and your kids love it.  They have softball or BBQ’s and the associate pastor is a surfer dude that makes everyone feel really mellow and good.

Every Christian I have ever known has been through this at least once.  Many have done it more than once.  In the past 20 years the trend has been toward larger churches. Many people go from a 100 member church to a 300 member and eventually end up at a mega church.  That’s one of these 1000 plus churches with million dollar television screens and a rocking worship band and an organization that does a Billy Graham version of church on every Sunday, three or four times and maybe on Saturday night too.  But, eventually people at those churches end up on the outs as well.  There’s something missing they might say, or they miss the community of a smaller group, or they find that the organization is impersonal and run like a big business.  The food court is really fun for a while, but when you really need help, you have to make an appointment with a certified MFC counselor or you just want to get to know one of the 100 associate pastors, but they are burned out and so busy that you can tell that they are really only engaging you as a “customer” not as a friend.  A new disenchantment sets in.  Unfortunately, the disenchantment after a few churches can mean a new disenchantment with Christianity.  The leavers who jump ship often jump with a sense that maybe its more than screwed up people who make screwed up churches.  Maybe it’s a screwed up faith as well.  Whatever the cause, there’s a growing group of people that I’m calling the Outchurched.  They are leaving the church, and maybe skeptical of the church and maybe of Christianity.  They are people with honest hearts and minds who tired of the hypocracy; bored of the repetition; skeptics of the sermons; suspicious of the politics of the new Right and the role of that in church; ambivalent about new buildings and new programs.  They are asking questions about social issues; they are globally conscious; they might not be anti-gay, and wonder where that fits into their faith; they wonder why churches don’t engage in poverty issues, why the church backs the wars; they want to know why all of the resources of the church go to buildings and sound systems and why kids go to camp in the mountains to get spiritual instead of to Mexico to build houses for the poor.  They wonder why people are judged for drinking by people who are assholes; why they are judged for having pre-marital sex by perverts hiding behind prudishness.  They wonder why they should listen to bad Christian music as a path to greater spirituality when there’s so much better music to inspire them outside of Christian music.  They wonder why there’s a whole sub-culture of Christianity with its special words, inside meanings, expectations and philosophy of life tied to a lot of questionable theological conclusions.  They question these theological conclusions, over and over and wonder if they are crazy.  They don’t have a theology degree; they feel guilty for questioning things. But, their heads and their hearts keep telling them that all of this just doesn’t add up.  By the time they leave, they are either really screwed up or the most free and wonderful people you’ve ever met.  The only difference between these two results is whether the person is still guilting themselves or whether they are really free.

For many Christians, instead of just leaving church and leaving Christianity at the same time, my hope is that people will leave the church only to FIND Christianity.  My theory is that the most important group of people is this invisible population of leavers, the outchurched.  These folks are where its at because they were willing to shed the institution and many, maybe most, of them are very genuine.  If they were not, they would have stuck around despite their misgivings.  They would have played along and felt good about their place in the community.  Instead, they probably pushed themselves out to the fringes for years as subversives, maybe even encouraging others to bail out before they themselves did.  They found new language to communicate what faith was all about because they got tired to the language of the church, which requires a long time in the church to even begin to understand.  They’ve had beers with other leavers on the way out, and maybe even had some of their best experience out there on the fringes before they left, meeting the other people who had found their way to the back rows of pews and to the fringes of the church community.  But, eventually they do leave and they are relieved and hopefully, they are there because they believe.  They are actually there from a deeper faith than they knew existed, a faith that has to exist without the good feelings of a good sermon or the emotional outpouring of a good song or hymn or the hugs and encouragement of familiar people.  These are the makings of a fresh wave of faith, a modern approach to Christianity that is more encouraging than anything that I’ve seen.  It surpasses the mega church movement, and maybe the evangelical movement itself.  Millions of good, faithful people are out there who have abandoned church, or are on the fringes and have written off church even if they still go occasionally.  They are the Church in a way that maybe most churches are not.  The Outchurch isn’t a new church or a new denomination, it’s a coined term to describe the people of the Church, the invisible body of Christ, who are simply not into church and maybe never will be.  I’m advocating the theory that they don’t need to, and that instead, they be recognized for what they are doing and given opportunities to organize enough to gain some benefits from each other, to network and dialog and find encouragement in the fact that they are more “right” than they thought they were when the left church, and they are not alone.

Posted in What is Outchurch | Leave a comment

The recovery group for the leavers and outchurched

It can take a decade to feel okay about leaving the institution.  Outchurch is looking to build a community for recovering churchaholics.  There’s nothing to sell you here.

Posted in What is Outchurch | Leave a comment

Outchurch

Outchurch is up and running.  Its a church for the leavers, the faithful churchless, the disenchanted, the cynical, the fringers, and anyone whose looking for faith outside of the walls of church.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment